Monday, October 27, 2014

Pakistani asylum seekers in Sri Lanka

 By Waruni Karunarathne Picture by Asoka Fernando

The Supreme Court of Sri Lanka recently dismissed a plea against the deportation of the Pakistan and Afghanistan asylum seekers in Sri Lanka, shadowing the small degree of hope that had been harboured by those who had tried to escape prosecution in their country.

A young Pakistan activist, Sadia Khan, who had been writing about abuses carried out by fundamentalists and members of the government in her country, had fled Pakistan in 2012, along with her mother and sister, in fear of their lives. She told The Sunday Leader that, hiding in two states had been a nightmare which she continues to experience. She also said they had spent millions of rupees and had sold their belongings including gold jewellery to support their stay in Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan government had confiscated their passports when they were sent to the detention centre. To compound the issue, since the time they had fled the detention centre, they had been often been paying much more than what was usually charged for accommodation to stay in a relatively safe place.

“Right now we are lucky to have a British resettlement officer from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHRC) to assist us with our plea. Our resettlement case will be processed in Canada. They want me undergo a medical test but I am too scared to go for one due to fear of being identified by the International Organization for Migration (IOM),” she explained. Even though she is being granted refugee status, she said she was living in fear that she may be caught and sent back to Pakistan where she is wanted for having written articles against the abuses that take place in her country. She stated that even though the UNHCR had requested the government to handover their passports, the government had not as yet responded to the request.

Khan went on to say that the UNHCR had done very little to overcome this situation. “They are moving very slowly to process the application, and receiving countries too take much time to work out the resettlement process. They do not help with the repatriation of asylum seekers who are rejected,” she added.

She said an asylum seeker named Anila Imran, who had petitioned the High Court against the arrest and deportation of asylum seekers, is being held in a detention camp. “Even though she and her family had been recognized as refugees, the Sri Lankan authorities have kept her under detention, and this is worrying us even more. Every day, as I plan to go for the medical test, I also keep putting it off due to fear of being found out,” Khan said.

Refugees self supporting

She stressed that Pakistani asylum seekers had brought sufficient money from Pakistan to meet their day to day expenses. “Most of them had sold their properties and had brought all the money in their possession to Sri Lanka. No one is a burden here. No one has committed a crime. Were there reports in any Sri Lankan newspaper about a Pakistani asylum seeker committing a crime?” she questioned.

“We are now at the mercy of God,” sighed a Christian doctor from Pakistan who did not want to be named. He had fled Pakistan with his son, daughter and his wife who is paralysed when he had heard that he was going to be persecuted under blasphemy laws, simply because he was from a religious minority. “We left all our relatives and property behind. We cannot go back,” he lamented. According to him, their applications had not been processed as yet and they are waiting to be called by the UNHCR for an interview.

“We came in May this year. The UNHCR is still processing applications of those who had come in 2013. It will take some time. We want the Sri Lankan government to have some patience and give the UNHCR sufficient time to process our applications to resettle us in another country,” he said, and added, “The UNHCR is doing all they can at this point in time, but it is up to the Sri Lankan government to have some concern over the matter.”

Another Pakistan asylum seeker, Haris Javed, said he several others along with his wife are in hiding in a church as they fear another surge of deportation after the Supreme Court had dismissed the case against deportation. “Things have not been easy in Pakistan. We fled that country to find consolation somewhere in the world,” he added. He made a plea to the Sri Lankan government to consider their situation and think twice before sending them back to the hands of the perpetrators in Pakistan.

Human rights lawyer, Lakshan Dias, who had appeared in Court in support of the plea against deportation, told The Sunday Leader that, they had argued on the grounds of International Customary Law to stop the repatriation of asylum seekers. According to him, the government had argued, stating that Sri Lanka is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, and therefore has no obligation towards any asylum seeker.

However, he added that, refugees are not a new concept in the world – even though countries initially did not accept non-refoulement laws, later these laws had become part of the International Customary Law as many states came to accept laws against the rendering of true victims of persecution, back to their perpetrator.  “Sri Lanka as a state is bound by the customary law, whether we accept it or not,” Dias noted.

Lack of laws in Sri Lanka

According to him, the Court had stated that there was a lack of laws in the country regarding asylum seekers, and therefore the government was not bound to take any responsibility. “The Sri Lanka government had signed the United Nations Convention Against Torture and had enacted it in Parliament in 1994 but without Article 3 which includes a section prohibiting parties from returning, extraditing or refouling any person to a state where there are substantial grounds for believing that he/she would be in danger of being subjected to torture,” he further noted. He also said Sri Lanka had signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) but the country had enacted a diluted version of the same, and it had omitted some sections including sections on refugees, and therefore Sri Lanka is not bound by non-refoulement laws.

He marked that none of the South Asian counties had signed the UN treaty on refugee; nonetheless, South Asia had contributed to the population of refugees in the world in large numbers. He pointed out that refugees are a burning issue in South Asia – there are about two million Afghan refugees in Pakistan, over 100,000 Sri Lankans in Tamil Nadu, 300,000 Talibans in India, nearly 50,000 Bangladesh refugees in India and about 75,000 Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Dias also noted that Sri Lanka, being a country that had over one million of its citizens living as refugees all over the world during 30 years of the war as well as the political insurgencies that had beset the country, should therefore be seen as a country that was sympathetic towards the democratic rights of asylum seekers.

Most of those who had fled Afghanistan and Pakistan represent groups of religious minorities such as Christians, Ahmedis or Shias who are subjected to persecution, discrimination and violence in their own country, Dias explained. He also said that once the asylum seekers submit their application to the UNHCR in Colombo, that office would process the application and schedule a hearing.

He added that from 2005 onwards, the UNHCR had started accepting applications from asylum seekers in Sri Lanka under a written MOU with the government, so as to settle them in a third country if their applications are accepted after the hearing.

“If they can prove their case through written and oral statements, based on that, the UNHCR would accept their case and they will be granted refugee status. Until such time, nothing will be provided to them by the UNHCR. UNHCR only produces a recognition paper. Once the UNHCR recognizes them as refugees, they would be given an allowance for food, housing, and schooling for the children until they are resettled in another country. The process might take about two years. Till then, they would be at the mercy of the Sri Lankan government.” Dias explained.  According to him, since June this year, the Sri Lankan government has been arresting asylum seekers and sending them back to their respective countries.

He went on to say that what asylum seekers ask of the Sri Lankan government is that they be granted a proper hearing and fair trial, and if they (the asylum seekers) fail in the process, they could be sent back to their country. On the other hand, if such a process is not followed, and decisions are taken arbitrarily, it would be a violation of their democratic rights.

Durable solution being sought

Meanwhile, a spokesperson of the UNHCR in Colombo told The Sunday Leader that, the UNHCR has on numerous occasions, in different fora, both at national and international levels, advocated for the cessation of ongoing arrests, detention and deportations by the Department of Immigration and Emigration. “UNHCR has requested access to those in detention, and firmly believe they should be given a chance to have their asylum claims heard and assessed,” she added.

The spokesperson added that the UNHCR is not aware of any refugees being deported to date. “However, the records we maintain indicate that the Government of Sri Lanka had deported 312 asylum seekers, including 274 to Pakistan and 38 to Afghanistan since 1 August 2104.  As of 7 October, the UNHCR is aware of 61 asylum seekers (21 Pakistanis and 40 Afghans) who continue to remain in detention at the Mirihana Detention Centre as well as in a private house in Negombo, under the care of the Department of Immigration and Emigration. The total number arrested by the department between 6 June to 7 October 2014, stands at 426,” she noted.

According to the UNHCR spokesperson, under the prevailing context, UNHCR had taken steps to increase its own physical and human resource capacity to process more asylum applications, as well as to find a durable solution for the refugees.

Friday, October 3, 2014

Plea of a Pakistani Asylum seeker in Sri Lanka

Sadia Khan is a Christian woman victim of Pakistan and Sri Lankan Generals. She wrote on human rights issues involving Pakistan Security forces She was attacked & they were threatened. They came to Sri Lanka to save their life but Pakistan followed them. On the request of Pakistan ISI, Sri Lankan authorities kept them in detention their passports were confiscated. They fled detention when they were about to be deported secretly. Though recognized refugees this fateful family still lives in hiding. They have a huge threat to their life. UNHCR & Canada save their life before they are captured, disappeared & killed. 

Sign this petition & save their life: Canada please resettle us immediately

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Sri Lanka asks UNHCR to expdite resettlement of refugees & extend financial help.

Oct 02, Geneva: Sri Lanka today called on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and refugee receiving countries to expedite resettling of refugees and assist Sri Lanka with resources to provide facilities to asylum seekers until they are resettled.
In a statement to the 65th Session of the Executive Committee of the UNHCR on Thursday in Geneva Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva Mrs. Samantha Jayasuriya said despite not being a signatory to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, Sri Lanka has been accommodating refugees/ asylum seekers in the country and the country is burdened with the influx of refugees.
Sri Lanka has been facilitating the work of the UNHCR according to the working arrangement between the Government and the UNHCR in 2006, with regard to the issuance of certificates by the UNHCR to asylum seekers/refugees.
During the last two years Sri Lanka witnessed an almost 700% increase in the arrival of asylum seekers/refugees, the envoy told the Committee. By June 2014 there were 1,606 applicants and 321 refugees.
Sri Lanka has come under criticism from the UNHCR and the human right organizations for deporting the Pakistani and Afghan asylum seekers back to the countries they have fled.
Since early June, Sri Lankan authorities have arrested and detained a total of 328 refugees and asylum-seekers, and deported 183 of them to Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The UNHCR asked the Sri Lankan government to refrain from deportations and abide by its obligations under international law.
The Sri Lankan government said the country is burdened with the influx of refugees and the UNHCR is too slow to process their cases and resettle them.
The envoy told the committee that the process of resettlement has slowed down considerably in 2013/14, resulting in serious law and order, security, as well as health related issues for Sri Lanka.
The Sri Lankan government, being sensitive to the humanitarian aspects of asylum seekers/refugees, has sought UNHCR�s assistance in addressing related issues through several measures.
Sri Lanka asked the UNHCR to establish a safe house or welfare center for those identified as refugees until they are accepted for resettlement in a third country.
The government wants the UNHCR to regularize the process of return of asylum seekers whose claims have been rejected, as at present, once rejected, UNHCR bears no responsibility for the welfare or return of rejected asylum-seekers.
Sri Lanka asked UNHCR to expedite the process of resettlement to ensure its completion within a short period of time and ensure that asylum seekers are provided with adequate facilities and monetary assistance to live in Sri Lanka until their claims are processed or resettlement is found.
Noting that these issues remain yet to be resolved and expressing its willingness to work with the UNHCR, Sri Lanka requested the refugee receiving countries to expedite the processes of finalizing resettlement claims and to also assist UNHCR to enhance its resource capacity.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

An innocent Christian writer being persecuted in Sri Lanka

A peace bird trapped in a cage
Full of hope and
Exhausted with struggles to get herself free

While she fights with 2 States
She is in the cage
No way to escape
While she sits & waits
Looks at the closed gates

She wants to fly away
She wants to run away 
She wants to smile again 
She sits and waits
For someone to take away all her pain

Note: This poem is about Sadia Khan.
Please support her by signing this petition

Thursday, September 18, 2014

A Refugee in Sri Lanka left alone to be killed

Originally posted by Sadia Khan

Written by: Sadia Khan
A refugee woman threatened by 2 states protected by none.

Sri Lankan most famous lawyer Lakshan Dias confirmed to UNHCR that Sadia Khan is wanted by 2 states.

I am Sadia Khan. I wrote about Pakistan intelligence agency (ISI) & became a target of 2 friendly States Pakistan and Sri Lanka. I fled Pakistan with my little sister & mother to save our life and got trapped by Sri Lankan intelligence (SIS)

Sri Lankan authorities took our passports & all we had. We were illegally detained and were about to be deported on the request of Pakistan ISI when we fled from the detention.

For the last 2 long years we live in hiding and bleed every day.  

Though its crystal clear that 2 States want to take our life none has protected us so far. While Sri Lankan authorities are looking for us we continue to live in fear.

Here are the main points. It is very clear that Pakistan is chasing me in Sri Lanka.

(1)  When I wrote by the name of Khizra I was followed on the internet which continues to date.

As soon as I got exposed, Sri Lankan authorities took us to the detention.

(2)  An officer who was the part of special CID team, shouted at me, "You give our information to India." Another said "why did you do that, you don't know your country."

(3) Officers in the detention camp told us clearly.

"Your case is between ISI and SIS. ISI Head contacted SIS Head to investigate about you. Special investigation team is investigating about you. You will be taken to the court and deported."

(4)   Two very well educated Pakistani men came to the detention camp at different occasions and collected information about us from the other detainees.

(5)  When I had a minor heart attack, a Doctor in the Hospital told me that Sri Lankan authorities have    informed the Hospital Management that I am a spy. 

(6)  I was guarded by armed police men and women in uniform in the hospital.

(7)   My mother was not allowed to visit me.

(8)  I called my church Brother from the hospital and asked him to help me. He said "police came to my house to investigate about you. They have declared you a criminal and its a crime to help criminals. You don’t even know what you are being charged with"

(9)  When I was discharged from the hospital, 2 police officers took me to a horrible looking jail, they talked about me and my name was enlisted there.

(10)  In the detention camp I discussed all this with a very kind immigration officer He said with lot of worry "I am also listening to this Spy Spy thing"

(11)  In October 2013 I called immigration Department of Sri Lanka. I spoke to the Deputy Controller General of immigration. I asked him if I get married to a foreigner and want to leave your country will you return my passport? 

He said no why did you come here?.

(12)  I spoke to another immigration officer Assistant Controller Bandara and asked for help. In the guise of a friend he told me, Special forces are looking for you, I will secretly return your passports. Run to India. Leave this place this call must be getting traced.

(13)  Easwaran a Christian Sri Lankan journalist promised me that he will take me out from this trouble. After speaking to  Sri  Lankan foreign Ministry sounded very worried and wrote to me that he cannot afford to support me anymore.

(14)  After the publication of my appeal  to the president in the newspaper, I was positive and thought its over. I called the same officer who was very kind to me and asked him If I could move freely. He said 

"Hide hide Special Forces are looking for you." He also told me that according to the authorities I was recently spotted in Jafana. (I have never been there) He was also very worried that my call will be traced to him.

(15)  Mr Tatari an Afghan detainee told my mother on phone that immigration officers have asked him about me( Sadia) several times. They are getting more and more aggressive and want to know my location. They are accusing him that it was him who told me how to get out from the detention camp.

(16)  During my efforts to save my life I called Pakistan High Commission several times.   They tried to trace my calls and  tried  to convince me to pay a visit to them (to be arrested) Deputy High Commissioner Amna Baloch who actually wanted to help me told me that she had no access to my file in the embassy. It was horrible to know that I had a file in Pakistan high Commission Sri Lanka.

(17)  Recently I called Sri Lankan Immigration and once again requested them to return our passports so that we can move about freely before our resettlement to a safe country. They kept insisting that I should pay them a visit. 

UNHCR requested Sri Lankan Govt & Immigration department to return our passports. They did not comply & keep holding our passports.

Last but not the least,

During our detention Lakshan Dias the most famous Sri Lankan lawyer ,Chairman of SANRIM, who has currently challenged court decision about the deportation of Asylum seekers in Supreme court wrote to UNHCR confirming that he has 1st hand knowledge  that I am targeted by Pakistan friendly Sri Lankan SIS to fulfill the request of Pakistan ISI. I am putting the snapshot of his email below.
2 long years have passed. Though we have a huge threat to our life yet we  are not saved by any other state.